video via bigthink.com

Can't help but feel compelled to make this draft into the a formal post straight away. Might not be doing much impact but I thought I might as well write it anyway.

I feel Dr Hawkings has over emphasized in the logic of hard core Sciences for survival. For if there is lack of humanity in various ethical thoughts, that our human race would perish despite technological advances.

There are certain uncanny ways about how life and the universe works which perhaps is incomprehensivable even by science. Despite the rules that human mind research could delve into in their individual ways and feelings about how things work. I think we have not developed till that stage where the entire universe can be fully comprehend, else we will not have developed new problems that need new solutions to solve. If we have genuinely understood the root concept of problem solving, we will not problems sprouting out from existing ones. We could have simply sort the problem spot on.

Many of these problems simply morph in form. Not loosing an ounce in essence, the solutions usually require a far more complex way of solving.

If we need to sustain our race beyond the next 100 years or so, we need to find the root problem as to why we have come to this dire point. The thinking process doesn't require a mere escape in the physical space we live.

I have no doubt that one day our race will eventually be left with no choice but to emmigrate to space. That is if we cannot change what what we have been doing in time. The future living space may well be mars; it may well be a human made platform or synthetic space ground for our future generations to live on. Under a totally new environment, a brand new set of problems will sufface if we cannot face out our own humanisitc problems in thought which controls our decisions that shape our living space on earth.

There is no doubt that the brilliance of the human mind could also solve some of the toughest scientific problems around. However, I have the feeling that we may be dwelling in linear thought or rather we are moving into a history old, seemingly genetically formulated code in our genes into digging more deeper holes and simply swapping spaces for our root problem ---- the pertinent issue that we refuse to face the daunting thought that we have been bending rules of nature which is the result for our current dire situation.

We have not changed much in the area of survival. Human greed has not been changed much for centuries and let history be told, whether in total truth or with partial biasness, that our forebearers have merely altered their way of being selfish and that technological knowhow has been used to further exploit in the most uncanny of ways.

There is no doubt that we would eventually be living in space if our existing problems cannot be eradicated in time. It may well be we cannot sort them at all. Climate and land changes have proved in reality of the impending outcome of extiction if we still live on this planet. We have almost depleted our natural resources and also at the expense of other living species in any form for the sole selfishness of just one specie, and that is us.

We need to be truthfully honest about what we and our forebearers have done and how our past and existing thinking had maketh us our own assassinators for our own sustainable survival.

Our knowledge in humanities, science & technology should continue advancing in depth and in width. But we need a source of change that directs us to genuine sustainablity. And that is to make a real conscience about who we are and what we need to do. Not with the impurity of new so-called colours that smudge; but with the eventual outcome of being totally pure as light that will shine us into ever lasting exisitence.

And that one of the several human components may well be a far simpler thought: and that is ethics of sharing, loving and to be far less menacing & hypocritical in today's fast advancing, pragmatic life of selfish materialism. We are all in a way guilty. Perhaps via the way of doing bit of good everyday and have a far more daring gut toadmit fault & make every modest good step forward; we may perhaps create a miracle that science and religion will be most happy to jot down in our human history.

It's really a collaborative effort.

Got to run off now. It's a very quick one-off draft. I want to write more. But I have to go off for now. ---- Karen Fu

Posted via email from Daring to Posterous-ly Change


Valentines or not, love takes flight & romance at the Waterfront on Sentosa Island. I think what I saw yesterday night was somewhat different because there was a power trip. But I have been curious over the past 24 hours about the details of its design. Fell sick with a bad strep throat, I took my mouse for a snoop around the internet. Power shut down had cut short of the love birds' story. Now I know it was supposed to be a ~ magical~ love story between a pair of mechanical cranes and how their splendid love for each other turned them into real birds and flew off gracefully happily ever after.
In any avian's case, I've found the entire show very creative: from the story plot to the beautiful choreography of the cranes' movements to how the cranes were set into the waterfront area. All these had produced a simply delightful performance. The weight of these birds were hidden not only by the dark night skies as a backdrop, but also its visual and audio technologies appeared to lighten these heavily mechanical birds felt & looked far less robotic & clumsy than it actually was. The water effects, especially those spraying out of the birds as wings made them appear to propel with elegance and speed. The accelerated feelings of this avian couple were illustrated in brightness and movement as they progressed in their courtship. The entire multimedia drama had its dramatic impact that spread across the entire waterfront area, making its sheer presence felt. I couldn't see what were the actual materials of these lovey doveys but it did somewhat offered a sense of commedy because of its comical physical form. It looked almost cartoon-like. its initial brash mechanical sense finally transformed both into to full blown natural, blood and flesh warmth real cranes.Stunning.
I especially enjoyed the beautiful play of water & multimedia presentation on its 'chest-panels'. I like such innovative ideas that brings up imagination when it comes to the arts. The whole Crane Dance structure weighs 500 tonnes: each crane weighs 80 tonnes. The whole plan could have been excellent if it were not for the power failure. I wonder if the heavy downpour in the past weeks had an impact but I think there may have been other reasons for the breakdown.
Other technical details: (extract from Resorts World Sentosa)
*designer:
Jeremy Railton
*control systems to prevent collision – similar to those used by Japanese bullet trains.
*The cranes are powered entirely on four giant hydraulic power units, totally 5,000 horsepower – each HPU is good enough to fly a small aircraft.
*36,720 litres of sea water is used in each show to form wings' – the same volume of fresh water can sustain ahe WaterFront.
Where could you see this:
Singapore's Sentosa Island.
Starts at 9pm daily.
Duration: 10 minutes
Location: WaterFront
Fee: Free Admission
Doesn't take up much time, but it sure packs one up to think about its entire wonder & how the whole design works. VERY interesting!- Karen Fu
Reference:
1.Tiny Island
2. Resorts World Sentosa
3. Further Technical & Concept details Live design Online